top | item 26197928 (no title) marczellm | 5 years ago The article's veracity for me becomes questionable when it mentions that his father was a Catholic lay priest. No such thing exists. discuss order hn newest yial|5 years ago Since it says that he was a teacher, could they be using it to say that he was not an official ordained priest? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priesthood_in_the_Catholic_Chu... marczellm|5 years ago I understand what the article means: he was a catechist. A priest or a layperson can be a catechist. But lay is the opposite of priest. load replies (1)
yial|5 years ago Since it says that he was a teacher, could they be using it to say that he was not an official ordained priest? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priesthood_in_the_Catholic_Chu... marczellm|5 years ago I understand what the article means: he was a catechist. A priest or a layperson can be a catechist. But lay is the opposite of priest. load replies (1)
marczellm|5 years ago I understand what the article means: he was a catechist. A priest or a layperson can be a catechist. But lay is the opposite of priest. load replies (1)
yial|5 years ago
marczellm|5 years ago