I think Alexa and Siri are two examples of poor software ethics in practice. Ethics are more than just "don't kill or enslave people", but thinking about "if we make this choice, what consequences will it have, and will those consequences be negative to anyone?" In general, I think "don't name something a name which is given to people" is a not entirely obvious, but fairly good rule.
This also related to the practice that if you meet someone, and you think of a joke or quip based on your first impression, don't say it: It might be novel to you, but they've heard it before and are likely very tired of that being everyone's first interaction with them. True for names, physical characteristics, professions, etc.
I agree, it's been also going on in hurricanes and even memes (Karen). In fact how about not naming things that are already used in general (Windows). At the very least we won't have to sit through lame obvious puns but at best we don't pollute the namespace.
Related: Being married to an actual Siri made it easy for us to rule out one of the home automation platforms. (I asked, but somehow she didn’t feel like changing her name.)
I am acquaintances with a Siri. She's seems like a nice person, but since she works in a service industry I bet she's tired of hearing "Hey, Siri" all the time. If I was her, I'd ask for permission to not wear a name tag.
> Having been the 32nd most popular name for girls born in 2015, Alexa's rank dropped to 139th in 2019, the lowest it's been since 1992.
Thanks for the link provided by adjkant below, here's the ranks per year:
2019 139
2018 90
2017 65
2016 51
2015 32
2014 63
2013 60
2012 57
2011 55
2010 50
2009 43
2008 50
2007 40
2006 39
2005 66
2004 72
2003 67
2002 69
2001 78
2000 87
I agree that ranks in 2018 and 2019 is low and on point. However 2015 is already an outlier. The sentence doesn't make much sense statistically. It's a bit like picking data points purposefully.
It's certainly become an inconvenient name to utter around our house, due to the responses it elicits from our countertops. So my daughter came up with the idea of referring to the device as "Amelia" whenever we talk about her. It has worked brilliantly and I suggest that everyone adopt the same convention.
We purposely say "ALex-uh" in group calls instead of "uhLEXa", because we talk about the service and devices all the time and using the correct pronunciation would trigger 10-15 Alexas sitting on everyone's desks!
It's the same problem having a dog. You can't go mentioning its name willy-nilly or it'll respond. But dogs go one step further and adapt to misuse of their name by unlearning it. I refer to ours as various insulting names even when she's not around, out of habit.
We just say "the echo" when we want to refer to it without triggering it. But you can change the hotword in Echo devices anyway, if you don't like "Alexa".
Funny coincidence I was just wondering this a few weeks ago when reading a Tinder bio of a girl named Alexa who had something to the effect of 'heard all the Alexa jokes for a lifetime thanks'
Made me wonder if there is a class action lawsuit where all of the Alexa's could sue Amazon for psychological distress or something.
I know an Alexa and she says the same. I'll admit I hadn't thought about it before but it does sound like an incredibly annoying thing to have dropped on you from on high: constant jokes, if anyone addresses you in an Amazon-enabled home all kind of crap gets triggered... I can see why people are infuriated by it.
People named Alexa should be given special privileges with the devices. I’m thinking muting but maybe the device should start apologizing and arranging free packages.
I wish these companies wouldn't anthropomorphize the systems so much. I catch my mother calling Siri "her", and my wife calls Google Assistant "her" because she has it set to a feminine voice. I try to remind our small children that it's just a computer, there is no person behind it.
It's important, because I've noticed that folks who humanize these assistants start having expectations of their capabilities that far exceed their reality. If you understand the assistant to be a crappy menu system on top of a regular, ol' Google Search, you can start to use them more effectively. My father thinks yelling the same request, word for word, will get a different response from Google. You might as well have tried typing a search into the Google website, got the wrong results, and then typed in the same search in all-caps.
There's almost no continuity between commands. I wish they would not create continuity for the extremely small subset of factoid lookup commands they've manually programmed in and just leave everything to a single, unified model that is more predictable.
I use Google Assistant to check the weather, add items to the family grocery list, play music, and entertain the kids with animal sounds. That's about all it's good for. It does it pretty well. But to expect more is an exercise in frustration.
i heard there are some parents that make their kids say "thank you" or "please" to their voice assistants. that really bothers me for some reason. its like putting "please" at the end of a google search. its just plain illogical
It's more relevant to call them baby names when considering popularity since that's the age of the person when their name is chosen. This recent decline is only a decline in baby names, not necessarily adult names.
Yep, they basically "cancelled" an entire name. I know two people named Karen, both of whom are kind and sweet ladies, and they are sick of it. I am just hoping that my name is not next.
Perhaps the upside of having a biblical name that is shared by 10 million other Americans is that it probably isn't too easy to twist it into an insult.
Edit: that may be an overestimate. Still one of the most popular names in the US, but a more official source (SS) suggests there are no single names which are shared by more than about 5M people.
May be a correlation can be made with Siri. Has the number of people named Siri (if any) gone up? From an ethical point I wonder the true affect of using a name that already exists in society. I do see the effect it has as it is intended to be more human-like.
The same as why you might name your dog George. Should there be robot-like names.
'The year when the name Alexa was most popular is 2015. In that year, the number of births is 6052, which represents 0.311 percent of total female births in 2015.'
[+] [-] Laremere|5 years ago|reply
This also related to the practice that if you meet someone, and you think of a joke or quip based on your first impression, don't say it: It might be novel to you, but they've heard it before and are likely very tired of that being everyone's first interaction with them. True for names, physical characteristics, professions, etc.
[+] [-] djmips|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] PostThisTooFast|5 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] jmosbech|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] reaperducer|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ben509|5 years ago|reply
That's nuts. It's just a bit of paperwork!
[+] [-] SomeHacker44|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] azurezyq|5 years ago|reply
> Having been the 32nd most popular name for girls born in 2015, Alexa's rank dropped to 139th in 2019, the lowest it's been since 1992.
Thanks for the link provided by adjkant below, here's the ranks per year:
2019 139
2018 90
2017 65
2016 51
2015 32
2014 63
2013 60
2012 57
2011 55
2010 50
2009 43
2008 50
2007 40
2006 39
2005 66
2004 72
2003 67
2002 69
2001 78
2000 87
I agree that ranks in 2018 and 2019 is low and on point. However 2015 is already an outlier. The sentence doesn't make much sense statistically. It's a bit like picking data points purposefully.
[+] [-] MarkLowenstein|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thrtythreeforty|5 years ago|reply
We purposely say "ALex-uh" in group calls instead of "uhLEXa", because we talk about the service and devices all the time and using the correct pronunciation would trigger 10-15 Alexas sitting on everyone's desks!
[+] [-] NullPrefix|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mc32|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] exporectomy|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LeoPanthera|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cadence-|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mentos|5 years ago|reply
Made me wonder if there is a class action lawsuit where all of the Alexa's could sue Amazon for psychological distress or something.
[+] [-] afavour|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ChuckNorris89|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] flycaliguy|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|5 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|5 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|5 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] moron4hire|5 years ago|reply
It's important, because I've noticed that folks who humanize these assistants start having expectations of their capabilities that far exceed their reality. If you understand the assistant to be a crappy menu system on top of a regular, ol' Google Search, you can start to use them more effectively. My father thinks yelling the same request, word for word, will get a different response from Google. You might as well have tried typing a search into the Google website, got the wrong results, and then typed in the same search in all-caps.
There's almost no continuity between commands. I wish they would not create continuity for the extremely small subset of factoid lookup commands they've manually programmed in and just leave everything to a single, unified model that is more predictable.
I use Google Assistant to check the weather, add items to the family grocery list, play music, and entertain the kids with animal sounds. That's about all it's good for. It does it pretty well. But to expect more is an exercise in frustration.
[+] [-] mackrevinack|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vmception|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Waterluvian|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] exporectomy|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adam12|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] da_big_ghey|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mackrevinack|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] flukus|5 years ago|reply
I'm kind of surprised they ever used the brand for anything after that.
[+] [-] Johnny555|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] whoisjuan|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rootusrootus|5 years ago|reply
Edit: that may be an overestimate. Still one of the most popular names in the US, but a more official source (SS) suggests there are no single names which are shared by more than about 5M people.
[+] [-] polka_haunts_us|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 8bitsrule|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] djmips|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] withaplomb|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jzer0cool|5 years ago|reply
The same as why you might name your dog George. Should there be robot-like names.
[+] [-] kowlo|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adjkant|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Gys|5 years ago|reply
From https://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi
[+] [-] eplanit|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ajay-b|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] musicale|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] CameronNemo|5 years ago|reply
A word that used to command respect and awe now connotates shipping waste and overworked warehouse laborers.
[+] [-] dyingkneepad|5 years ago|reply
[+] [-] exporectomy|5 years ago|reply