(no title)
giveexamples | 5 years ago
If not you individually, maybe should select certain group of people to represent the people and create rules to enforce bad behavior is stopped?
Maybe we can call this body a government and call the rules laws.
giveexamples | 5 years ago
If not you individually, maybe should select certain group of people to represent the people and create rules to enforce bad behavior is stopped?
Maybe we can call this body a government and call the rules laws.
cmeacham98|5 years ago
In my opinion, society is more tolerant when we do not let the intolerant people hijack it to spread intolerance. In other words, intolerance is some of that "bad behavior" that should at least be softly prevented. I am expressing this opinion on this discussion board in the hope that other people will agree with me and maybe even change their minds slightly (or maybe I'll have my mind changed instead!).
giveexamples|5 years ago
For ideas - remove ideas by banning / censorship, or add ideas by promoting 'better' ideas - this seems like a possible avenue to improving society's mental health. The main objection is whoever controls what to ban / allow is given a lot of power, so how do we decide these things.
For people - I think it's fine to be intolerant individually, however our institutions should not be intolerant. For example I can hire a cleaner for my house and refuse certain people. However it should not be possible for a company to refuse certain people as cleaners. I'm not sure how to formalize this into a law though.
Physical or mental violence because of intolerance of people and ideas are bad because I don't want violence on me. However I am not certain how to define mental violence.