(no title)
fgimenez | 5 years ago
1. Their major thinking is that the growth of index funds is driven by volume of new investors, not necessarily market performance. At some point we hit the diminishing returns of new money into indexes. When that happens we'll see their "guaranteed" growth slow and you'll need to turn to hedge funds for alpha. He thought 10 years was enough for this to play out. Obviously wrong on timing, but not necessarily wrong on outcome.
2. One of the conditions of the bet was that they have lunch once a year to discuss bet progress. Given that charity lunches with Warren are going for 4.5mm today, they essentially got 10 lunches for 100k each. That is...quite valuable for a hedge fund manager.
Now, nobody can sell a loss better than a hedge fund, so I take with a grain of salt. But it is some food for thought.
pedrocr|5 years ago
tybit|5 years ago
qeternity|5 years ago
Having spent most of my career as a hedge fund trader, I absolutely agree with Buffet. But I think a decade of the largest monetary interventions skew the numbers massively in favor of a long only passive investor.
fgimenez|5 years ago