[trap_chateau]

Sorry but I have to chime in here. His thoughts seem insightful and relevant to discussion. You are calling his contributions 'meaningless' and condescendingly telling him twice to 'be specific'. That's not how things are meant to be discussed around here and not how you get an answer out of someone.

[wokwokwok]

I’m comfortable, reading his comment history, that a blunt request to explain how the the comments are relevant to the OP (and the failure to articulate them when bluntly requested to do so) I indicates that what seems “insightful” is in fact, not falsifiable and therefore nothing more than armchair philosophy.

I’m not into that, so if it terminates the discussion then so be it.

There was nothing meaningful to discuss.

[mjburgess]

Yip. I couldn't move myself to type the obvious: a person replying to my comment doesn't determine whether I am "on topic".