(no title)
troglodynellc | 4 years ago
So much so that I wrote what may? be the first third-party client for it: https://metacpan.org/pod/Playwright
Here's my writeup on why I like playwright versus selenium: https://troglodyne.net/posts/1617057517
troglodynellc | 4 years ago
So much so that I wrote what may? be the first third-party client for it: https://metacpan.org/pod/Playwright
Here's my writeup on why I like playwright versus selenium: https://troglodyne.net/posts/1617057517
pydry|4 years ago
troglodynellc|4 years ago
Most of this is invisible to end-users of selenium, as it's just a hammer they pick up; the struggles of the maintainers is not (nor should it be) something they have to worry about.
Nevertheless, they probably could get some hay mentioning that their API implements a significant amount more functionality versus every other cross-browser testing framework.
That said, they really don't have to, the work really stands by itself.
Vinnl|4 years ago