[MarblePillar]

Missing the point.

The null hypothesis determines the "unfounded claim". For example, judicially, the null hypothesis is, "You are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law." Similarly, commercially, the null hypothesis is, "If it's profitable and mostly legal, corporations will compete to do it better."

Fingerprinting is both profitable and legal. It is so profitable and so legal that today's most dominant corporations, entities representing trillions of dollars of value, are founded on its premise.

The "unfounded claim", therefore, is yours. Or do you have any evidence that you are not being surveilled?