(no title)
scriptkiddy | 4 years ago
I got into making music using DAWs and learned a lot of theory. I focus on making Synthwave/Outrun style music. Not the most technically complex genre sure, but there is a lot of room for creativity as the genre isn't very well defined. I also enjoy how Synthwave isn't really about musical complexity or technicality; instead, it's about the atmosphere. It's nostalgia for a time that never existed in a sense.
Now, all of this to say that I'm still not a great musician. I've been learning banjo for the past year, and getting pretty good at it.
I'll get to the point though: to me, algorithmic music isn't an end, it's a means to an end. The end in this case is composing music. Algorithmic music can be a source of ideas and inspiration in a way that nothing else can. This is especially true if we are able to specify the rule set for music generation. How many times have I sat down at the keyboard and tried to write a melody over some really cool rhythmic bass line I came up with? Countless times. If I could, for example, plug in the a key, rhythmic signature and feeling I'm going for and generate a melody, I would be able to finish more songs. I could use the generated melody as a starting point; it might spark some new ideas. This would be even cooler if I could provide the algorithm with a wav file or some midi and have it try to generate a bass line, melody, chord progression etc.
So, I guess I see algorithmic music generation less as something to replace human made music and more as a tool to aid in sparking creativity in humans composing music.
brokenmachine|4 years ago
>I'm still not a great musician
These two statements might be connected. Great musicians redefine or create their own genre. Followers are constrained by the existing definitions.
You play synthwave on a banjo? That sounds pretty creative to me.
scriptkiddy|4 years ago
Lol no. Those two things are not related, though it does give me some ideas.