top | item 26929490

(no title)

sacomo | 4 years ago

I can't help but wonder, "what's the point?", if this is all going to result in the destruction of our natural habitats in the end anyway.

discuss

order

xnx|4 years ago

Wind and solar results in much much less destruction of natural habitat than fossil fuels.

sacomo|4 years ago

I'm not up to date on current industrial-scale solar cell manufacturing processes, but doesn't the manufacturing proccess still require massive amounts of coal? And what is the lifespan of the cells before they have to be replaced with new cells that also require coal to be produced?

On the battery side, I'm pretty sure that industrial-scale production still requires mining and mountain top removal. And what are wind turbines made out of? Where are we getting those resources from?

Like I said, I'm not up to date on the state-of-the-art industrial manufacturing processes required to make solar cells / turbines. But I'm pretty sure it will still require massive habitat destruction and the release of unimaginable amounts of greenhouse gasses to get us where we need to be.