(no title)
thelean12 | 4 years ago
1. Do your own research -> see something concerning -> ask your doctor to verify/interpret -> follow doctor's orders
2. Do your own research -> see something concerning -> accept your research as truth
#1 is valid and good.
#2 is bad.
This has always been the case.
caeril|4 years ago
In the general case, a physician is obviously better than a patient in terms of being informed.
On the margin, however, a well-researched patient will almost always be better informed than a physician accustomed to the average patient. This is particularly relevant to the ~130 IQ HN populace.
thelean12|4 years ago
It's quite dangerous and egotistical to think that you are in that group, though. When most people think they're a better than average driver, many are bound to be wrong.
If you think you're right about something and the doctor is wrong, get a second opinion. Don't assume you know better than a medical professional.
thelean12|4 years ago
Sure, in the sense that you can get second opinions if you're extra concerned about the topic.
If you're pregnant or have a blood clotting issue, by all means get a first and second opinion if you're worried about getting the vaccine.
But don't think that you are more qualified than medical professionals to understand the risks and side effects (unless of course you are a medical professional).
argvargc|4 years ago
thelean12|4 years ago
Everywhere did I say that you are much more likely to make mistakes than your doctors.
unknown|4 years ago
[deleted]