Why would Apple go through the effort of adding support for booting alternative OS's on M1 Macs and then stand in the way of implementing drivers for the hardware? That doesn't make a lot of sense, IMHO. Especially considering Apple could have gone the exact same path as iOS devices, which is a heavily locked-down platform that shares a lot in common.
easton|4 years ago
notaplumber|4 years ago
Either way, going after OS developers would be an extremely bad look for Apple, especially when they could just as easily disable the feature, or not have bothered finishing the implementation (or done it completely differently) after news of the Linux porting efforts started to spread (especially the Corellium public demo running Ubuntu).
ori_b|4 years ago
dapids|4 years ago
[deleted]
coldtea|4 years ago
Nobody here said about Apple "directly upstreaming code to Linux to support M1".
Parent said "adding support for booting alternative OS's on M1 Macs", which Apple did do.
watertom|4 years ago
OEM licensing makes sense for a SOC, plus the more the chip sells the lower the price per unit, so Apple would make money on the license, and lower their costs.
user-the-name|4 years ago