(no title)
0x000000E2 | 4 years ago
This may even apply to high end gaming machines. Soon as you have 2 SSD's or video cards you will exceed link budget on most Intel CPU's and everything slows down.
It also happens to routers. 10 gig NICs plus attached SSD storage, over link budget again.
Intel's stupid market segmentation is biting them in the rear
walrus01|4 years ago
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/docs/networ...
In calculating the bandwidth and pci-e bus throughput needed, a single 100GbE port is full duplex, so one has to budget about 210Gbps per port.
The funny thing is that some of the best 100GbE NICs for x86-64 servers on the market right now are Intel, but are best used on an AMD platform...
chx|4 years ago
Yes, the 3.0 version needs two PCIe x16 slots.
drewg123|4 years ago
We've been quite happy with Mellanox and Chelsio 100GbE NICs. The latest from each can do in-line HW TLS offload, which is a killer feature for us. No Intel NIC can do that.
IMHO the last good Intel NIC was the 10GbE "ixgbe" NIC. The design of the NIC was so tight as to be almost beautiful.
Recent 40GbE (and 10GbE based on the 40GbE chipset), and the new 100GbE NIC have the feel of being designed by a committee with endless features of questionable value stuffed in and consuming power and chip area.
9front|4 years ago