top | item 27248706 (no title) sweeneyrod | 4 years ago I think many mercurial users would disagree with you about git. discuss order hn newest jayd16|4 years ago Are we talking about market dominance, mind share or the idea that there's no real competition?MySQL and Oracle exist. Mercurial and perforce exist. I'm not sure it's a terrible stretch to compare git and postures. aidenn0|4 years ago I think the point is that git isn't "so much better" than mercurial, while pgsql has had a lead on mysql for quite some time on a lot of technical measurements. load replies (1)
jayd16|4 years ago Are we talking about market dominance, mind share or the idea that there's no real competition?MySQL and Oracle exist. Mercurial and perforce exist. I'm not sure it's a terrible stretch to compare git and postures. aidenn0|4 years ago I think the point is that git isn't "so much better" than mercurial, while pgsql has had a lead on mysql for quite some time on a lot of technical measurements. load replies (1)
aidenn0|4 years ago I think the point is that git isn't "so much better" than mercurial, while pgsql has had a lead on mysql for quite some time on a lot of technical measurements. load replies (1)
jayd16|4 years ago
MySQL and Oracle exist. Mercurial and perforce exist. I'm not sure it's a terrible stretch to compare git and postures.
aidenn0|4 years ago