top | item 27355510

(no title)

theFluke | 4 years ago

I meant native as in not fully built with web technology. Which, if I'm not mistaken, the alternatives posted in the previous comment are.

discuss

claymav|4 years ago

I’m personally not sure that is a factor for many users, a good web app is as good as a good native app on modern hardware

speg|4 years ago

I guess it depends how you define many, but I’ll take a native application over HTML any day.

throwaway292893|4 years ago

Many macbook developers do care if it's a native app or a battery draining chrome embedded app.

Kinda defeats the purpose of having a specialized CPU, OS & software to optimize battery usage.

ybbond|4 years ago

that matters, at least to me. that makes me prefer Paw over Insomnia and Sublime/neovim-kitty over VSCode

cultofmetatron|4 years ago

I have pretty beefy hardware so I don't notice the diff in terms of performance. I do however appreciate that the battery life isn't sucked down hard by native apps the way electron does. just having chrome open significantly affects my battery life.

wayneftw|4 years ago

I only want apps built with Electron or similar! Makes it easy for me to switch platforms, they get developed faster, they're easier for me to contribute to and they are infinitely more hackable.

Imagine optimizing your dev tools for battery life? As if I want to work on a single tiny screen all day...or in meetings, hotels, planes, trains...