I've seen your comments throughout the years and it's been one of the sparks for me to learn more about Bitcoin's power consumption, it is truly bizarre how easily shoved aside the argument about the climate impact of PoW cryptocurrencies is by their proponents. Seems that some on the Bitcoin train didn't realise that the concept and technology have been coopted by miners, etc. since the rift about increasing block size or not, the miners and others with high stakes in maintaining the status quo have won. They won't ever allow their investments to become worthless (or at least non-profitable) and now all the other smaller agents have to fight a war against that to ever have a chance to change the massive ecological impact of Bitcoin.
Thanks for shaping a path to educate myself on this issue, I recognised the Dyson sphere analogy pretty quickly, haha.
_Microft|4 years ago
(Spoiler: it's just the Kardashev scale with the additional condition that all available energy has to be burned on crypto mining)
TeMPOraL|4 years ago
Been worried about this for a while (see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21280454 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24309932).
EDIT: Merged pull request: quotes around "financial network" (usrusr)
EDIT 2: _Microft wins this day. I'm going to start using Nakamoto scale from now on. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27368015
piva00|4 years ago
Thanks for shaping a path to educate myself on this issue, I recognised the Dyson sphere analogy pretty quickly, haha.
h4kor|4 years ago
usrusr|4 years ago
Pull request: quotes around "financial network"
vsareto|4 years ago