top | item 27438746 (no title) Quenty | 4 years ago From another perspective, consider it probably did not cost $90 million to execute this plan. So overall, this is a net profit, and most likely cost effective. discuss order hn newest croes|4 years ago Was the plan to make profit or to reduce drug trafficking? Maybe they should reevaluate their goals. gscott|4 years ago The agency that seizes the money gets to keep it.This person had his motel all paid off. So the Government decided to size it because they could sell it. He fought them off, barely:https://www.wbur.org/news/2012/11/14/tewksbury-motel-owner-f... rahilb|4 years ago It was a top secret plan spanning multiple countries likely run by corrupt officials, I think it probably cost more than 90 million!
croes|4 years ago Was the plan to make profit or to reduce drug trafficking? Maybe they should reevaluate their goals. gscott|4 years ago The agency that seizes the money gets to keep it.This person had his motel all paid off. So the Government decided to size it because they could sell it. He fought them off, barely:https://www.wbur.org/news/2012/11/14/tewksbury-motel-owner-f...
gscott|4 years ago The agency that seizes the money gets to keep it.This person had his motel all paid off. So the Government decided to size it because they could sell it. He fought them off, barely:https://www.wbur.org/news/2012/11/14/tewksbury-motel-owner-f...
rahilb|4 years ago It was a top secret plan spanning multiple countries likely run by corrupt officials, I think it probably cost more than 90 million!
croes|4 years ago
gscott|4 years ago
This person had his motel all paid off. So the Government decided to size it because they could sell it. He fought them off, barely:
https://www.wbur.org/news/2012/11/14/tewksbury-motel-owner-f...
rahilb|4 years ago