(no title)
natfriedman | 4 years ago
The problems we spend our days solving may change. But there will always be problems for humans to solve.
natfriedman | 4 years ago
The problems we spend our days solving may change. But there will always be problems for humans to solve.
eloisius|4 years ago
Edit:
To expand a little and not sounds so completely negative towards AI, seems like there could be value in training models to predict whether a patch will be accepted, or whether it will cause a full build to fail.
skor|4 years ago
It would be a "cool tool" if it inspected the code statically and dynamically. Testing the code to see if it actually does what the AI thinks it should do. From running small bits of code on unit level to integration and acceptance testing. Suggest corrections or receive them. _That_ will save time and I and companies will pay for.
Also you cannot call this the "third revolution" if it is a paid service.
jonas_kgomo|4 years ago
dfkl|4 years ago
freedomben|4 years ago
therealplato|4 years ago
xna|4 years ago
alexanderdmitri|4 years ago
toomuchtodo|4 years ago
It all boils down to who is capturing the value for the effort and time expended. If a mediocre software engineer can compete against senior engineers with such augmentation, that seems like a win. Less time on learning language incantations, more time spent delivering value to those who will pay for it.
foobarbazetc|4 years ago
wolverine876|4 years ago