[ta2164]

>I’m done arguing with a throwaway account if you’re going to be intentionally naive.

Don't interpret logical reality as naivete. I know it's in style on the left to do this in 2021, but stop.

>“It’s not racist because it doesn’t specifically talk about race” is logical cowardice.

It's logical fact. If it doesn't specifically discriminate against race, a characteristic of race, etc., the law is by definition logically not racist.

The existence of inequity does not prove the existence of inequality.

>The rest of your comment is similarly tortured.

Similarly factual and logical, yes.

>That some POC succeed despite racism does not mean racism doesn’t exist.

Similarly, that some POC don't succeed despite the laws not being racist does not mean racism exists.