[ta2155]

>I'm pointing out that you for instance, could benefit from some perspective in understanding why there is disagreement between because we fundamentally have different word-views / disagree on the language of this argument.

There's objective reality, and then there's narrative safe delusions. I guess you're right, my world-view is objective reality, apparently yours isn't.

>It's like trying to argue about bikes, if your definition of bike is a self powered two wheel and mine is a motorized machine.

Poor example. What constitutes the definition of a bike is codified in law LOL! There's that de jure and reality striking again.