I might be alone with this but I really dislike Apple increasing the overall height / element margins on the top controls of Safari. They've been consistently doing it bit by bit with each new release and it constantly feels like I'm losing screen estate that could be filled with content to bits that are not and that I rarely interact with enough to justify it taking up so much space. I really liked the slim header part of Safari previously, especially switching from Windows and its set of browser design conventions.
I rarely if ever use the cursor to do anything with these controls because macOS has great gestures and it also has keyboard shortcuts to make the process feel a lot more result-oriented, rather than process-oriented with extra steps.
> I might be alone with this but I really dislike Apple increasing the overall height / element margins on the top controls of Safari. They've been consistently doing it bit by bit with each new release and it constantly feels like I'm losing screen estate...
I agree, but it seems like there's and (unwelcome to me) industry-wide trend towards less density and wasted screen real estate. At least Apple still ships 16:10 displays, unlike the 16:9 garbage that's ubiquitous nowadays.
I believe they've only increased the height once with the transition to Big Sur. And they reduced the height from Mavericks->Yosemite, so it's back to where it was during 10.1-10.9 days, just with one UI row + tabs instead of two + tabs.
Yes. Safari 13/14 had the larger Address Bar design change, but at least they kept the Tab Bar slim. The new "walked back" design is now a thicker / taller Tab Bar.
I really wish I could use Full Screen Safari with only the Tab Bar and not Address Bar. But this isn't an option, and Full Screen Safari has weird rendering bug and performance issues.
Not alone at all. My main reason for not moving from Catalina to Big Sur is because they've done this height/margin increase across the board to controls in Big Sur (toolbars in Finder, menubar icons, etc). I spend 100% of my time on macOS using a 13 inch laptop monitor. I need all the space I can get for actual content.
It feels like they’ve been slowly moving towards a touch-friendly interface on MacOS. I’m not sure if they intend to have a desktop OS that truly supports a touch screen or if it’s more about slowly merging iOS and MacOS in general.
I've really had enough of the minimalist, whitespace-everywhere trend.
I've been turning off most notifications, because since the controls were hidden, they're basically useless noise that just hides useful controls.
I know many designer-types want to get rid of the URL bar, but either butch up and fucking do it, or leave it as a useful tool. Quit shrinking it, overloading use, making it jump around another otherwise trying to make people not want to use it.
Iphone screens waste a ton of real estate, and (at least to my eye), it isn't even pretty, it frequently just looks unfinished, like the designer gave up on the job.
Ah, too bad, I've grown to quite like the previous beta! I don't tend to have a gazillion tabs open though.
I want my webpage to be as much page as possible, w/ as little chrome.
I think there's some danger in listening to internet outrage as your design process -- every big change generates a lot of dislike, but that doesn't mean it's actually a bad change, or that most people dislike it, or even that the people who hate it at first won't come to like it.
This thread is the perfect example of why you should mostly ignore internet “outrage”. Some people disappointed because they liked the new (previous) design. Others bemoaning aspects of the new (beta 3) design. Others who have never used either bitching based on a couple of screenshots. You can’t please…anyone.
That's why I'm hoping they'll stick to retaining the option—though knowing Apple, they'll probably axe that, too.
I personally prefer the compact design, but I also understand people being confused over it or just not liking it. Giving people the option serves both groups.
Why is there so much padding around each tab? I guess it makes for clear click targets. Honestly was a fan of the old initial design, though I do lean towards compromising for more screen space.
Your eyes deceive you. Prior MacOS versions have more overall padding (50pt) but it's put entirely within the tab itself. The new tabs have some margin between each tab and a much smaller padding within tabs, for overall what looks to be ~40pt.
The new design sacrifices the 'X' hover-over on the left side of each tab, presumably in favor of an 'X' that overlaps the tab title.
An assumption, but it seems to me and many others that they’ve been slowly moving to make macOS more touch interface friendly.
I’m typically anti-touch screen on laptops as it drives the price up for a feature I personally almost never use, but there’s so many use cases particularly for a large portion of Apple’s user base working with digital media.
Aside: A Lenovo Yoga -like MacBook would be cool, although I do like the Touch Bar for quickly moving around in media I’m listening to in the background (but I don’t think that’s enough to justify it).
This is basically the side-effect of the rollback, and it really sucks. Now, they have to keep this wasteful design, and less tabs will _nicely_ fit into the bar. I don't think the initial design was great, but I like it more over this!
It would have been nice if the article contained screenshots of the current and the upcoming design so non-macOS users can get a impression of the changes.
I was really hoping for them to fix it but keep the toppy-tabs... Exactly this design but switch the url bar and the tab bar.
If you think about the logical hierarchy of controls on a browser it should be:
- global stuff (extensions, sidebar reveal button, etc...)
- tabs
- url, forward/back/reload buttons, etc..
If you're going to mix the global controls with url I still think the tabs should go on top (like real-world tabbed folders). Chrome gets this right and Safari should just copy them.
I think the biggest issue for me was that you couldn’t consistently find your current tab in one single place - you could scroll away your active tab amongst the rest of them, hiding the address bar.
This was obvious from the start. The new design was beautiful but it was an accessibility nightmare.
This change looks pretty awful so I hope they just reach the Chrome v1 style and be done with it. Let's be honest, Chrome v1 was the peak of browser design and browsers are still trying and failing to improve it.
Personal computing won't be truly "personal" until we, the users (not $BIGCO's lead UX designer) get to decide how things look and behave on an individual level
There's a lot of value in NOT having to make those decisions. Most users don't want to think about how their computer or phone should work—they just want it to work out of the box. That requires sensible defaults and slowly introducing changes to adapt to evolving user behavior.
All of these issues would be gone if companies like Apple offered the reigns for users to modify their software as needed. I'm running firefox with a competent ad blocker, no tab bar on top, and a sidebar of tabs that appears when I hover the mouse. Sure, it took some finagling with config files, but this sort of stuff should be possible and accessible on a computer. I really wish Safari and Apple in general took a different approach. Firefox shouldn't be the only game in town.
[+] [-] beezischillin|4 years ago|reply
I rarely if ever use the cursor to do anything with these controls because macOS has great gestures and it also has keyboard shortcuts to make the process feel a lot more result-oriented, rather than process-oriented with extra steps.
[+] [-] michaeljbishop|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tablespoon|4 years ago|reply
I agree, but it seems like there's and (unwelcome to me) industry-wide trend towards less density and wasted screen real estate. At least Apple still ships 16:10 displays, unlike the 16:9 garbage that's ubiquitous nowadays.
[+] [-] npunt|4 years ago|reply
Are you thinking about something else?
[+] [-] ksec|4 years ago|reply
I really wish I could use Full Screen Safari with only the Tab Bar and not Address Bar. But this isn't an option, and Full Screen Safari has weird rendering bug and performance issues.
[+] [-] shbooms|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andyfleming|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vptr|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] psychometry|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] _jal|4 years ago|reply
I've been turning off most notifications, because since the controls were hidden, they're basically useless noise that just hides useful controls.
I know many designer-types want to get rid of the URL bar, but either butch up and fucking do it, or leave it as a useful tool. Quit shrinking it, overloading use, making it jump around another otherwise trying to make people not want to use it.
Iphone screens waste a ton of real estate, and (at least to my eye), it isn't even pretty, it frequently just looks unfinished, like the designer gave up on the job.
And so on.
[+] [-] dilap|4 years ago|reply
I want my webpage to be as much page as possible, w/ as little chrome.
I think there's some danger in listening to internet outrage as your design process -- every big change generates a lot of dislike, but that doesn't mean it's actually a bad change, or that most people dislike it, or even that the people who hate it at first won't come to like it.
[+] [-] robertoandred|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|4 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] yunohn|4 years ago|reply
I tried it out myself, and it was majorly disorienting. It was the sole reason I reverted from the public beta.
[+] [-] mark_l_watson|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] basisword|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] montagg|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pindab0ter|4 years ago|reply
I personally prefer the compact design, but I also understand people being confused over it or just not liking it. Giving people the option serves both groups.
[+] [-] skavi|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] npunt|4 years ago|reply
The new design sacrifices the 'X' hover-over on the left side of each tab, presumably in favor of an 'X' that overlaps the tab title.
[+] [-] samtheprogram|4 years ago|reply
I’m typically anti-touch screen on laptops as it drives the price up for a feature I personally almost never use, but there’s so many use cases particularly for a large portion of Apple’s user base working with digital media.
Aside: A Lenovo Yoga -like MacBook would be cool, although I do like the Touch Bar for quickly moving around in media I’m listening to in the background (but I don’t think that’s enough to justify it).
[+] [-] amirmasoudabdol|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Austin_Conlon|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] grishka|4 years ago|reply
Because it was designed by iOS people.
[+] [-] cbmuser|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jackson1442|4 years ago|reply
https://media.welsh.cc/2jGRw1
And what the Monterey design was to start with:
https://media.welsh.cc/ghhD24
Worth noting that the tab bar in Monterey will adapt based on the site's `theme-color` meta tag.
[+] [-] po|4 years ago|reply
If you think about the logical hierarchy of controls on a browser it should be:
- global stuff (extensions, sidebar reveal button, etc...)
- tabs
- url, forward/back/reload buttons, etc..
If you're going to mix the global controls with url I still think the tabs should go on top (like real-world tabbed folders). Chrome gets this right and Safari should just copy them.
[+] [-] rubyist5eva|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] grishka|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] angulardragon03|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wingworks|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cunthorpe|4 years ago|reply
This change looks pretty awful so I hope they just reach the Chrome v1 style and be done with it. Let's be honest, Chrome v1 was the peak of browser design and browsers are still trying and failing to improve it.
[+] [-] robertoandred|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] neilsense|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mark_l_watson|4 years ago|reply
Best of both worlds: if you only have a few tabs open, use the compact display, otherwise give up some vertical space for non-compact mode.
[+] [-] leucineleprec0n|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] juancampa|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sxg|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] andybak|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kevindong|4 years ago|reply
There is such a thing as too many choices.
[+] [-] wilg|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] elzbardico|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] _qbjt|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] buzzert|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anthk|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] alex_smart|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] CPLNTN|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dom96|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wejick|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] asdff|4 years ago|reply