top | item 27883560 (no title) igorzx31 | 4 years ago ^This person is wrong. FISA and FBI counter-intel have a low bar to get warrants because that's what congress intended. discuss order hn newest freeflight|4 years ago Indeed, the FISA court only exists to rubber-stamp warrants.In 33 years the FISA court granted 33,942 warrants, in that same time only 12 were denied, a rejection rate of 0.03% [0][0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intellig... perl4ever|4 years ago The rejection rate, in a vacuum, isn't evidence that they are rubber stamping warrants.From a logical perspective, it could mean that those submitting requests are able to avoid sending weak ones and choose to do so.I'm not saying I believe you/the standard view is wrong, but there must be some other evidence. load replies (1)
freeflight|4 years ago Indeed, the FISA court only exists to rubber-stamp warrants.In 33 years the FISA court granted 33,942 warrants, in that same time only 12 were denied, a rejection rate of 0.03% [0][0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intellig... perl4ever|4 years ago The rejection rate, in a vacuum, isn't evidence that they are rubber stamping warrants.From a logical perspective, it could mean that those submitting requests are able to avoid sending weak ones and choose to do so.I'm not saying I believe you/the standard view is wrong, but there must be some other evidence. load replies (1)
perl4ever|4 years ago The rejection rate, in a vacuum, isn't evidence that they are rubber stamping warrants.From a logical perspective, it could mean that those submitting requests are able to avoid sending weak ones and choose to do so.I'm not saying I believe you/the standard view is wrong, but there must be some other evidence. load replies (1)
freeflight|4 years ago
In 33 years the FISA court granted 33,942 warrants, in that same time only 12 were denied, a rejection rate of 0.03% [0]
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intellig...
perl4ever|4 years ago
From a logical perspective, it could mean that those submitting requests are able to avoid sending weak ones and choose to do so.
I'm not saying I believe you/the standard view is wrong, but there must be some other evidence.