top | item 27939852

(no title)

100011 | 4 years ago

They did not have the bravery to control for race. You might as well throw it in the trash, it is already politically colored junk.

discuss

order

viraptor|4 years ago

Are you implying that covid infections depend on the race? If not then controlling for socio-economic attributes should fulfill the role that you'd often see approximated via race. And if yes - could you link a relevant paper?

murgindrag|4 years ago

They did control for race.

And no, controlling for socio-economic attributes does not fulfill the role "approximated via race."

Statistically, racial differences tend to include:

- Cultural differences, including preferences for field-of-work, family structure, socialization patterns, etc., all of which affects R0

- Economic differences (e.g. Does one need to take a Tylenol and show up to work even when sick?)

- In some cases, medical differences (e.g. vitamin D, which appears to play a major role in COVID19)

- Geographic differences (communities tend to segregate by race, and outbreaks are geographic in nature)

- Trust of institutions (which impacts vaccination, testing, and treatment rates)

... and so on.

This is about group-level statistics, and isn't helpful with individuals.

But if you're doing a population study, yes, this is an important control.

maweki|4 years ago

They tried to control for uneven sociodemographic distribution of virus prevalence. Why would explicitly controlling for race be any more useful than that?

100011|4 years ago

[deleted]

mrob|4 years ago

The controlled for "racial-ethnic group". How does this differ?