(no title)
sergefaguet | 4 years ago
You are making the moral assumption that just because someone has a better negotiating position in a situation there is a moral obligation to intervene in some centralized way to “correct the imbalance.”
I am denying your assumption and presenting a different point of view which has no less of a claim to morality or truth than yours.
thethethethe|4 years ago
in your original comment you said:
> When this tactic is applied to any other factor of production it is called a “cartel” and engaged in “market manipulation.”
My comment was simply explaining the reason why this is the case