[nextlevelchess]

There are certainly some negative examples. But "The ability to play chess is the sign of a gentleman. The ability to play chess well is the sign of a wasted life." is way too harsh imo. You learn dozens of things that help you in life & business as well: -pushing yourself to the limit -how to learn best -how to get back on track after defeat and much more. For me, getting the GM title was sort of a life school. I'll profit from the journey my whole life.

[robrenaud]

The oppurtunity cost is huge though. That level of dedication, focus, and intellect applied to a productive endeavor like science, technology, or business is likely to push science forward or create millions of dollars of value.

Hikaru says becoming a GM to like getting two PhDs.

If studying and playing tons of chess very well brings you joy, by all means go for it. The wasted life part seems very harsh and judgy.

[nextlevelchess]

Sure, the oppurtunity cost is big. And I'm not saying it is the best way to put out value in the world.

Two PhDs sounds like a lot. After all, most GMs get the title before their twenties. But such comparisons are very hard anyway. But it is also possible to get the title while pursuing another career path, you don't have to focus 100% on chess.

As you say, the wasted life part is way too harsh and based on only some madly crazy examples in chess history.