(no title)
arthurmacwaters | 4 years ago
Regarding continuity of care: these providers mostly have recurring availability, which makes it very easy to schedule them in advance for CBT or other types of recurring visits. We lean into continuity, rather than trying to avoid it with async approaches.
Regarding folks going around our platform to see our providers: frankly, that would more a liability to our customers than it would be to us, because they are the ones trying to maintain patient stickiness. Oftentimes, these services are employee benefits, so there's less problem here with patients trying to go around the platform. But the long term answer is we want to make it SO much easier for providers to see patients via our channels that they don't have any reason to go around us (and have to deal with malpractice insurance, payments, scheduling, and video infrastructure on their own).
anonymouse008|4 years ago
I poorly rephrased the continuity of care in the third paragraph... I highly doubt someone is going to circumvent an EMR/scheduling platform to go see the provider direct, but I've been wrong about worse things. The comment was just to say I believe you'll want to invest in those predictive analytics down the road to make sure continuity is paramount.
What is more interesting in what I'm seeing you guys write is maybe you're going for acute and crisis care... which is smart.
ympatel|4 years ago