Creator here. PaperDelivery grew out of my frustration with Twitter. I found myself relying on Twitter to follow a particular research community, but realized that I do not care about the actual tweets/threads - all I wanted was the link to the underlying paper/article. I also did not like how often I got sucked into reading an opinion thread (often political), and I walk away (30 minutes later) thinking "do people really believe those things?". All I really want out of Twitter is some sort of personalized hacker news, and this is my attempt at creating it.
That really resonated with me. I basically stopped using Twitter because of the reasons you outlined here. This tool, however, might make Twitter useful again for me!
I propose that HN "charge" users 10 reputation points for a submission that links to twitter, and 1 rep point for linking to twitter in a comment.
This is not a punishment. Your comment doesn't get any grayer or dead-er. It's an incentive to deep link when possible.
If you can find a better link, we'd appreciate that. If you can't, then pay the fee, or quote the tweet. Oftentimes the important part of the linked tweet is just some other link; please post that directly.
The policy should be rescinded if twitter ever resurrects their non-javascript frontend (and pigs fly, etc).
There was an iOS app called Nuzzel that was my daily go to for Twitter news articles. It was also giving context for the stories such as comments made by folks retweeting it, which were actually very useful as a TL/DR and also because they would highlight some important aspect of these.
And there is also FlipBoard which you can link to your Twitter feed.
Is your aim somewhat different, I.e produce an “offline” way to read that doesn’t involve endless scrolling?
Nice. One minor thing: After you sign up, it tells you to check back in a while. Not sure people will remember that for long enough for there to be something there when they check back. Maybe something like "check back in a while or enable RSS" would work. With "enable RSS" being underlined and clickable.
Unfortunately yes. They see too many requests from paperdelivery.co and block requests originating from that domain - they only want the google bot to crawl their site :) I think I have two options:
1. Respect their decision to not allow PaperDelivery to fetch that page.
2. Use a set of proxies and headless browsers or outright impersonate the Google bot to trick the news websites into allowing PaperDelivery to fetch that page.
This is a cool project. Some months ago I also started consuming feeds in an async way by creating a daily personal newsletter with all my favorite creators and news sources (using mailbrew.com). I’m spending a lot less time doom scrolling because of this.
[+] [-] lonesword|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] omrjml|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] KirillPanov|4 years ago|reply
This is not a punishment. Your comment doesn't get any grayer or dead-er. It's an incentive to deep link when possible.
If you can find a better link, we'd appreciate that. If you can't, then pay the fee, or quote the tweet. Oftentimes the important part of the linked tweet is just some other link; please post that directly.
The policy should be rescinded if twitter ever resurrects their non-javascript frontend (and pigs fly, etc).
[+] [-] markcartertm|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] d4rkp4ttern|4 years ago|reply
And there is also FlipBoard which you can link to your Twitter feed.
Is your aim somewhat different, I.e produce an “offline” way to read that doesn’t involve endless scrolling?
[+] [-] nafizh|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oschrenk|4 years ago|reply
What happened to it? The website/service seems to be down?
[+] [-] amadeuspagel|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lonesword|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] harish5p|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lonesword|4 years ago|reply
1. Respect their decision to not allow PaperDelivery to fetch that page.
2. Use a set of proxies and headless browsers or outright impersonate the Google bot to trick the news websites into allowing PaperDelivery to fetch that page.
[+] [-] unknown|4 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] 0xferruccio|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cheeaun|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lonesword|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ashishb|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikevm|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lonesword|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] twoslide|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gopi|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] KirillPanov|4 years ago|reply