top | item 28026580

(no title)

boterock | 4 years ago

That review at the end is strange in many ways, it shows the sad truth about economics between other countries and the US. If someone is doing something good, but is not for the benefit of the US, then it is bad. If we develop a technique to harvest locally, efficiently, imagine how much the rest of america would stop depending on US for their industrial needs. So it naturally it appears harmful to the US.

US media has done so much harm to the world, at this point I think THEY are the harmful thing, telling the story that benefits the US despite the truth of many places being better without the US imperialism.

discuss

order

gradys|4 years ago

Setting aside that the Economist is not actually a US publication, are you of the view that it's good for Cuba that at the same time that they're rationing food, so much of the country's farmland is in low productivity state-run farms?