WingNews logo WingNews
top | item 28093387

(no title)

mike3498234 | 4 years ago

> We don't even mention the giant logical leap from finding someone possessing CP to automatically considering them a child molester, yet someone posessing an action movie is not considered a murderer.

Are you suggesting it's OK to possess CP as long as you're not a molester? What a fucking idiot.

discuss

order

hughrr|4 years ago

That's a stupid assumption to make based on that. If someone emails or messages you a picture then you're in possession of it if you chose to be or not.

Mike8435|4 years ago

No it was not a stupid assumption. You need to read more carefully as I exposed a flaw in his reasoning. The suggestion was that since CP possession does not prove physical molestation, therefore it is OK. Actually possession of CP is a crime in itself. This is an objective fact. I've known of otherwise intelligent people who do believe its actually OK to possess child porn if they're not physically molesting anyone.