top | item 28102420

(no title)

brenschluss | 4 years ago

It’s called a name, and names have real meaning, because they’re created with social agreements. Paper money, too, is valuable only because we agree to do so.

Ergo,

Saying “all this hullabaloo over a bunch of green paper” about money is… both true in a physical sense and misses the mark in a sociopolitical sense.

Saying “a giant rock causes harm” is both true in the physical sense and misses the mark in a sociopolitical sense.

discuss

order

grawprog|4 years ago

It's name is Chamberlin Rock. It wasn't given the other name, it was called it one time in a journal article in 1920.

nullc|4 years ago

So, if someone calls twitter by a racial slur once in the 1920s someone will come and take it away?

You don't say...

Overton-Window|4 years ago

Capitulating to the lowest common denominator is a recipe for disaster. The self-anointed who feign outrage over an inanimate object are just chasing power.

ndkwj|4 years ago

[deleted]

krapp|4 years ago

>The self-anointed who feign outrage over an inanimate object are just chasing power.

What power do you believe the Wisconsin Black Student Union, campus planning committee and Wisconsin Involvement Network (Wunk Sheek) are chasing, and why do you believe it was necessary for them to conspire to pretend to be upset about this inanimate object?

What do you believe this cabal's true end goal is, now that the rock has been moved and nothing stands in their way?

IfOnlyYouKnew|4 years ago

So either the rock is meaningless, in which case... "more" power to them?

...or it's removal is meaningful, in which case they were right?

Either way: they have some not entirely implausible story of it being a symbol of something universally abhorred.

You are getting emotional in your indignation over their emotion. But then... that's it, isn't it? So you're grasping at straws trying to find some sinister motive in their actions, and base your argument on the absolute meaninglessness of the McMuffin at the center of it, and how you couldn't care less about it's whereabouts. But in the end, your argument comes back to "this doesn't matter".

So they kinda win by default, overwhelmingly, even if one were to agree that it's meaningless?