[trailrunner46]

I can see how you came to wanting this but I think it could lead to dangers for many.

For most people (this is not financial advice for any one person) money in checking and savings should have a low rate of return and therefore low volatility because they need or may need that money to actually be there to pay bills or in times of crisis (emergency savings). Once you have these two pools of money, then you should invest in retirement and finally extra taxable investments. Most people should automate the money going into retirement and investments I agree but turning your entire checking account into a volatile/uninsured pool of money I think is the wrong direction.

[stefanheule]

I like your explanation of how to think about money, and I think it's the right strategy for some people. But there are also a lot of people (e.g. if you have a decent amount of extra taxable investments) you can do better your checking account in the market. Yes, this has risks (markets can drop), but this is okay for many people. One way to deal with this is to just keep more money in the "checking account". This is fine, now that the balance is getting market returns.

[trailrunner46]

Im not sure I agree with this. If you have a lot of extra taxable money just put it in a taxable investment account and keep some lowing amount in checking to handle bills. Keeping it all in checking and making the entire thing investments seems like an odd approach, the low interest you are getting in like <10k in your checking is not a big deal.

[md_]

Note the point I made elsewhere: that you’re likely to draw on your “cash” emergency fund in times of market downturn. (E.g., you lose your job because of layoffs due to a market crash.)

Having that “emergency fund” be invested in the market means you will have “buy high/sell low” events.

For sure some people can afford this and just like to live dangerously, of course.