(no title)
stefanheule | 4 years ago
"passive index investing and instant cash access are fundamentally opposed": I agree, this is the case right now, but we want to change that, because there isn't any fundamental reason for this.
Yes, people will owe tax, but remember that only your gains are getting taxed. So if you get a tax bill, it's because you made money. That is still a net-positive. There are also a lot of things you can do to reduce (though not eliminate) the tax burdon, such as carefully selection what investments to sell, predicting money flow (e.g. not investing a paycheck if rent is due a day later), tax loss harvesting, etc.
vineyardmike|4 years ago
They are opposed. Passive investing requires long waiting and holding, not lots of tx like a checking and cash access require.
Margin against the contents might be better, since you can keep the gains and not pay tax.
> e.g. not investing a paycheck if rent is due a day later
Yea, this is the problem! If you use this as a checking account, then you can't NOT invest it.
stefanheule|4 years ago
However, doing that is really hard, and requires you to micromanage your checking account. I personally (before using FC) had $10-20k in my checking account, because 1) I really want to make sure I don't miss a rent payment because I mess and 2) I don't want to micromanage. So, at least in my situation, some of the money is moving in and out and can't really be invested, but a decent chunk (probably >10k) just sits there. I imagine this is true for many people.
shmatt|4 years ago
rmah|4 years ago
konne88|4 years ago