top | item 28186771

(no title)

gsg | 4 years ago

This works until the analogue of monotremes shows up to ruin your supposedly flawless categorisation.

discuss

order

nfw2|4 years ago

I didn't say the categorization was flawless; I said it reduced the complexity of the information. Categories can be useful without being flawless.

rmdashrfstar|4 years ago

It is not a “can be”, it’s a “must be”. Models or an abstraction of complexity are necessarily both reductionist and useful.