top | item 28261855 (no title) viseztrance | 4 years ago Well the symlink command was also easier to share with others having the same issue, whereas a one liner that creates an executable script which returns 0 is less ideal. discuss order hn newest cmeacham98|4 years ago An empty script returns 0 by default, thus `touch /path/to/missing/library` is a sufficient (and shorter!) one-liner fix to this problem. viseztrance|4 years ago I know, but you still have to make it executable, hence it's not as convenient.And on top of this, an unlink is less error prone than a rm -f.
cmeacham98|4 years ago An empty script returns 0 by default, thus `touch /path/to/missing/library` is a sufficient (and shorter!) one-liner fix to this problem. viseztrance|4 years ago I know, but you still have to make it executable, hence it's not as convenient.And on top of this, an unlink is less error prone than a rm -f.
viseztrance|4 years ago I know, but you still have to make it executable, hence it's not as convenient.And on top of this, an unlink is less error prone than a rm -f.
cmeacham98|4 years ago
viseztrance|4 years ago
And on top of this, an unlink is less error prone than a rm -f.