(no title)
eatporktoo | 4 years ago
As far as fueling/charging- Even if you had to pay a few people in the short-term to do the work, it isn't a high-skill job. Being generous, I can't fathom a situation where it could cost more than $2 per car in physical labor. Assuming you could drive more than 200 miles on a charge, that is less than a penny per mile in cost. Also, there are already gas stations in some states with people that will fill your gas tank for you. I am also sure an autonomous solution would be devised if that became a limiting factor. You could pretty easily design a purpose-built system for it.
I agree that regular maintenance needs to be performed, but I don't agree that the companies themselves need to solve the problem on their own. This seems like it would be something to easily contract out to a local company to handle. For standard maintenance and cleaning, there are plenty of companies that clean cars and plenty of companies that perform maintenance on cars already. It should just be a matter of getting contracts in place and making sure that they have software to do their jobs.
I didn't do the math to figure out the cost of a human driver vs the total taxi cost, but even if true the cost isn't trivial. Truckers, for example, can make upwards of $80k per year and that's not even at 50% utilization for the vehicle. If you assume a taxi driver would make $40k/year and they have 50% utilization of the car (I'm making up numbers for the sake of discussion), that is still a significant amount of cost. I would be surprised if maintenance and fuel would be $40k per year regardless of vehicle.
breput|4 years ago
You're right that a Waymo would probably outsource the interior and (probably) mechanical maintenance to local providers, but they would need to deal with that in every city and with the additional technology involved in self-driving, you're probably not going to trust that the local shade tree mechanic will be able to handle that. So you have at least two problems now.
Over The Road drivers do make surprisingly good money, but that is a skilled job with a significant amount of training and regulation. In-town cabbies are often people with few other opportunities and are easily exploitable. The taxi cab business is notorious corrupt and is a big part of how Uber/Lyft could easily replace these services.
morpheos137|4 years ago
The biggest expense people are not seemingly considering is the depreciation of the vehicle. taxis don't last long because the drive so much and so much stop and go. There could easily be $10,000 in depreciation a year.
The diver does things a robo car will not be able to do like help people with their bags, clean the car, responds flexibly to situations as they arise.
eatporktoo|4 years ago
Assuming super expensive fuel and terrible efficiency...
Gas car - 20 miles/gallon, $4.00/gallon ($4.00/20 = $0.20/mile. $10,000/$0.20 = 50,000 miles)
Electric car - 200 miles/74kWh [Tesla M3], $0.25/kWh (74 * $0.25 = $18.50. $18.50/200 miles = $0.0925/mile. $10,000/$0.0925 = 108,108 miles)
So assuming a gas car since the miles are the most expensive there, you would be looking at 50,000 miles for $10,000 in fuel. That checks out for me.
Using that assumption.
Uber charges $0.78/mile and $0.27/minute.
Assume only 75% of driving is charged to the customer (going to a fare, going to a charger, etc), that gives you 37,500 miles.
Assuming 45 miles per hour (probably too high) at $0.27/minute = (37,500/45)60 = 50,000 minutes of driving $0.27 = $13,500
37,500 miles * $0.78 = $29,250
So $42,750 in rev. - $30,000 in fuel, insurance, maintenance, and depreciation, you're still $12,750 in profit. Again, is pretty much giving every disadvantage possible. In an electric car scenario you could easily drive 200,000 miles on $10,000 in electricity. Which would multiply all numbers by 4.
I'm not trying to take your numbers too specifically, just illustrating for the sake of discussion.