[jeffh]

"Over a third of the country’s vegetables and two-thirds of the country’s fruits and nuts are grown in California."[0]

I'd be careful to imply blame on a single state, when it is a large part of the population that relies on the output. There are certainly ways to target water waste in agriculture, but the whole nation has a stake in successful water management.

[0] https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/Statistics/

[ericmay]

Yes but I'm not sure they have to be. I live in Ohio. My wife and I grow lots of things pretty easily: kale, peppers, lettuce, onions, broccoli, tomatoes, all sorts of herbs, etc.

The thing is to my knowledge California is just cheaper/better because full sun and up until now you could just pull water from the ground and grow your crops.

IMO we need more urban and suburban gardens to supplement, and we'll have to just relocate some crops away from California and other drought-prone areas. Tough times ahead for some.

And as much as even I despise the suburbs, I think they're prime for retrofitting. We have a lot of land, we just need changes to zoning, a little more density, and more emphasis on the local community which can come from the former. Like why can't we all grow a few crops (nothing crazy) and just trade once/week at someone's house?

[Thrymr]

There is plenty of agricultural land in the midwest to grow vegetables, it's just that for the most part they are growing commodity crops (corn and soy) and not vegetables because California is cheaper and can provide fresh produce year-round (or nearly so). Regional farms could provide local produce that's more scalable than suburban gardens, but both are seasonal (without greenhouses and other infrastructure at least).

[WarOnPrivacy]

> why can't we all grow a few crops (nothing crazy) and just trade once/week at someone's house?

HOAs. The same entities that insure every waterway for miles is forever polluted with residential runoff.