top | item 28387465

Old photos of Bedouin nomads, 1898

337 points| starkd | 4 years ago |rarehistoricalphotos.com | reply

171 comments

order
[+] prepend|4 years ago|reply
I once had tea with some bedouins in Jordan’s Wadi Rum around 2015 or so and these pictures could have been of that tea. The tent looked the same.

They were really nice people who just stopped some travelers for tea and a chat. They weren’t selling anything and wouldn’t take any gives or thank yous. Frequently when traveling you’ll get some fake hospitality experiences that end up just “gift shopping” but this experience was neat to me as they seemed just interested in travelers.

I wonder how frequently they do that as the road wasn’t super busy, but also wasn’t abandoned. We maybe spent half an hour and no else came by.

[+] IndySun|4 years ago|reply
Also traveled that area, late 90s thru 2000. Somewhere with caves we went scrambling all over until through one hole a friend and I had clearly and unknowingly climbed into a families living room. Their first words (in Arabic), would you like some tea? You're english, right?

We hadn't realised (or ignorantly) but we were scrambling over a lived in area, peoples property. The reaction from everyone we randomly met was the same, warm, smiling.

[+] cheese_goddess|4 years ago|reply
Intereseting way of milking goats:

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZaZgfe2Gyk0/XqHI23JcnqI/AAAAAAAAW...

The animals are in a line bunched up close and alternating facing so that one animal has its head on the shoulders of the two animals next to itself and looking towards their rear.

I haven't seen that before. More peculiar is that I can't see them eating anything. Normally when animals are milked, it's lunch (or dinner) time. They line up in front of their troughs and they're milked while they eat. Typically there's some kind of divider or railing to keep them more or less still also. Otherwise you need to have really well disciplined and calm animals or you'll get lots of hooves in milk pots and so on.

It's also very interesting to see how they dried their cheeses on top of their tents. These look like small, lactic cheeses. If they had a good source of salt they would probably be very high on salt both to help preserve and sanitise them and also to replenish the salt lost by the people to the heat of the desert. Anyway that must have been really strong cheese: sun-dried, very salty, goat's milk cheese. Yum.

[+] h2odragon|4 years ago|reply
Them critters is tied to something.
[+] cletus|4 years ago|reply
These photos are of stunning quality. I'm not sure I've seen any 19th century photos that come close, even with retouching and postprocessing. But also the lighting is incredible. Like it looks more like something associated with a more modern (ie post-WWII) technique.

I didn't see any mention of the provenance of these photos. Anyone know?

[+] wincy|4 years ago|reply
Interesting that they say “taxation” of caravans was their source of income, so were they effectively grifters making caravans pay them for protection money?
[+] patrec|4 years ago|reply
Grifters is probably still on the euphemistic side -- one wonders what happened to those unable to meet "tax" bills. In the early 2010s present day Bedouins in the Sinai were widely reported to supplement their incomes by torturing would-be migrants from Africa to death unless their ransom money demands were met by the families or harvesting and selling their organs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee_kidnappings_in_Sinai

[+] stkdump|4 years ago|reply
I think this is an interesting thing. If you scale the idea of 'country' down to the size of a tribe, then you can call it taxation, whithout any euphemism. They control/own the land, they decide the 'laws' on it. If that is good or bad for development of a region is another question.
[+] cobbzilla|4 years ago|reply
I read that as a very polite way of saying that, historically speaking, they were widely regarded as thieves. As in, if you traveled in certain places of the desert without an armed escort, you would be robbed.
[+] amitport|4 years ago|reply
It depends on the specific tribe. But absolutely, yes, some of the Bedouin tribes were (and still are) in the "protection" business (in the criminal sense). Some tribes have other professions.
[+] pcrh|4 years ago|reply
This article about the history of Greco-Roman Palmyra recently posted here [0] shows that Palmyra citizens made their living as caravan traders ferrying goods from India and China to the Roman empire across the Syrian desert.

It's likely that part of their success in doing so was by having effective alliances with Bedouin tribes of the region.

>"Palmyra’s role in all this was to help get the merchandise over the eight hundred miles that separated the cities and ports of Syria from the Persian Gulf and the sea route, by crossing the Syrian desert to the welcoming banks of the Euphrates and the fertile Persian territory; this was the annual adventure of the large caravans. The bartering and the palavers with tribal chiefs and the bribing of the Roman and Persian customs officers were done in Greek and Aramaic, the international languages of business."

So this "taxation" likely has a history going back over 2,000 years and would be a known feature of trading relations, not very different from paying a fee to use the Suez canal today.

[0] https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/home/oasis-palmyra

[+] paganel|4 years ago|reply
They most probably were in possession of the monopoly of violence in those parts of the world and as such, like any other state, they exercised their rights to tax people.
[+] user3939382|4 years ago|reply
I took an interest in the Bedouins after seeing the film Lawrence of Arabia, which features them. If you haven’t seen it and have a few hours to kill, you definitely should.
[+] 618033988749894|4 years ago|reply
I highly recommend the book Lawrence in Arabia, by Scott Anderson, which puts that story in context. It follows four people active in the area at the time: TE Lawrence (who first went to the Middle East as an archaeologist), an American employee of Standard Oil, the leader of a Jewish spy ring working with the British, and a Turkish official. Very interesting.

https://www.powells.com/book/lawrence-in-arabia-978030747641...

[+] pimeys|4 years ago|reply
This one is also one of the rare movies that benefit from a higher resolution. Watch it as 4k from a big screen. It will look fantastic.
[+] publicola1990|4 years ago|reply
I recommend the book T E Lawrence wrote on which the movie was based upon: "Seven Pillars of Wisdom".
[+] martinpw|4 years ago|reply
"Arabian Sands" is an fascinating book describing travels though the empty quarter in Saudi Arabia and interactions with the Bedouin at a time when their way of life was about to start changing fast (1940s):

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabian_Sands

[+] craigching|4 years ago|reply
1898 is pretty early in the technology of photography, maybe I didn't read carefully enough, but I would like to know what was used to take these photographs. They are very interesting and look better than I would expect for 1898!
[+] pvg|4 years ago|reply
A little bit more about the people who took photos and all of the photos can be found here. The submitted article is more or less blogspam

https://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/matpc/colony.html

As to the history of photography, when these were taken Fenton's [in]famous pictures of the Crimean War were already 50 years old. Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky colour pics of the Russian empire are of about the same early 20th century vintage.

[+] skhr0680|4 years ago|reply
Old photos can look amazing because they used really large film. What is considered a full frame sensor now was the cellphone camera of its time.
[+] ginko|4 years ago|reply
It's over 50 years after the invention of photography. Plate photography was already quite a robust technology at that point in time. Sensitivity and exposure times weren't too bad either. The first experimental color photographs were made some 20 years earlier.

For reference this color photo was made about 10 years after these: https://www.loc.gov/resource/ppmsc.03959/

[+] hellbannedguy|4 years ago|reply
Smiling makes me think it was later, along with the white woman, and baby.
[+] dqpb|4 years ago|reply
“123 years from now, these images will be transmitted on a vast world wide information network. These small windows into your life will make impressions on the minds of thousands of future strangers across the globe. And incredibly, the magic of this journey through space and time, will be cheapened by embedded pop up ads.”

- Bedouin Oracle, 1898

[+] ammmir|4 years ago|reply
What wonderful pictures! I just realized I rarely see people smiling or looking happy in photos taken in the 19th century. I wonder why?

Maybe cameras of the time were too big and serious looking, and everyone ended up posing.

[+] jacobolus|4 years ago|reply
Smiling to cameras is a learned behavior, and not something unfamiliar adults do naturally. (Kids do more smiling in general and are less aware of cameras / less self-conscious about their appearance, so if you go somewhere without a culture of cameras and take candid shots, you’ll get more smiling kid pictures than smiling adult pictures.

My godparents are indigenous Maya peasants from southern Mexico, and until the last decade or two no adult in their village would ever smile to a camera, and certainly not in a formal portrait. Nowadays they are more exposed to mainstream Mexican/World culture, and norms are changing fast, but if you tell some adult you want to take their portrait you are still likely to get a very serious expression.

[+] ruph123|4 years ago|reply
The reason I heard is that it took a long time to take a shot and was expensive. So you did not want to mess up a shoot with a smile. Better go for the safe option and put on your RBF.
[+] stef25|4 years ago|reply
When traveling in SE Asia maybe 20 years ago, locals would ask me to have their picture taken. The older people would just stand there stiff as a plank and absolutely no expression on their face.

Younger kids would put their index finger & thumb in the shape of a gun and hold that under their chin and they would smile.

When I take pictures of my own kids (toddlers) they also have no idea about smiling, you have to "teach them" but then you end up with super fake expressions.

[+] aemreunal|4 years ago|reply
I once read that it was because the norms of that time were to appear more seriously. Smiling in photos is apparently a new(er) norm.
[+] kevin_thibedeau|4 years ago|reply
Long exposure times require static poses that can be maintained.
[+] 4ad|4 years ago|reply
Fake smiles, in photos or otherwise, is an american thing.
[+] jart|4 years ago|reply
The Turks pay me a golden treasure, yet I am poor, because I am a river to my people! https://youtu.be/DvH6PT7I_dI
[+] noisy_boy|4 years ago|reply
This scene amused me to no end when I watched it:

---

T.E. Lawrence: My friends, we have been foolish. Auda will not come to Aqaba. Not for money...

Auda abu Tayi: No.

T.E. Lawrence: ...for Feisal...

Auda abu Tayi: No!

T.E. Lawrence: ...nor to drive away the Turks. He will come... because it is his pleasure.

Auda abu Tayi: Thy mother mated with a scorpion.

[+] graycat|4 years ago|reply
Of course, now Saudi Arabia has changed a lot due to oil revenue and, then, construction of cities, especially near the coast of the Persian Gulf.

But in recent years, surprisingly, Saudi Arabia is well into farming! The have borrowed the idea used in dryer parts of the US called center point irrigation. So, from a central pivot, they have a long boom, on wheels, that goes round and round spraying water drawn from the center point.

For the water? There was lots of it in the area some thousands of years ago, and it accumulated in fresh water aquifers now some hundreds of feet down.

In addition, on their west coast, that is, along the Red Sea, there are some mountains and, surprisingly, moisture blows in from the west and generates rain in the mountains. Soooooo, they've been capturing the runoff from that rain and using it for more agriculture.

[+] baud147258|4 years ago|reply
> fresh water aquafers now some hundreds of feet down.

though once the aquafers are empty, they won't refill anytime soon with the current precipitations

[+] devchix|4 years ago|reply
I've always wondered why desert nomads dress like they do. Given modern fabrics and constructions, would you chose to dress like this to go to the desert? I understand it is an area of extreme heat in the day and extreme cold when the sun goes down, the head and face protection I understand, but the flowing, multi-layered robes? The conjecture would be that they insulate more than disperse heat via evaporative cooling? Seems like we have cold-weather gears figured out with cold and high-altitude expeditions, but desert gears?
[+] ars|4 years ago|reply
There are several reasons. One is that white fabric is transparent, and the sun will reach the skin. Black fabric blocks the sun, and the heat is kept in the upper robe, and doesn't penetrate inward.

Another reason is the structure of the garment - it's a robe that is open from top to bottom, this allows air currents to flow along the skin, drawing away moisture and cooling the person.

The heat of the sun acts as the engine that causes that airflow (i.e. it's worth slightly higher temperature, which will then cause the hotter air to rise up, and out the neck carrying moisture with it).

And finally, you don't want a sunburn.

Modern heat control is all about exposing the skin for the cooling, but it relies on shelter and sunscreen to block the sun.

If you can't block the sun then you want a garment to do it.

[+] okareaman|4 years ago|reply
Polygyny, where one male mates with more than one female while each female mates with only one male, is thought to be the fundamental mating system of animals.

https://web.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/Pol...

I didn't realize there was a more specific form of polygamy that is thought to be the fundamental mating system of animals

[+] chunyu_wang|4 years ago|reply
I had the opportunity to learn about Bedouins in my anthropology class two years ago. It's nice to finally see some pictures of them.

Their eyes seem quite large to me.

[+] danlugo92|4 years ago|reply
I wonder how much different would 1798 look from 1898.
[+] allovertheworld|4 years ago|reply
I think before the industrial revolution, things definitely moved a lot slower.
[+] 2rsf|4 years ago|reply
Interestingly they look and behave quite similar even today as one can see in southern Israel, some replaced camels with an old beaten Subaru 4x4 but they still used tents, grow animals and wear traditional clothes
[+] flyinglizard|4 years ago|reply
Toyota Corollas, but yes, pretty much the same (at least as you go farther into the desert).
[+] jonplackett|4 years ago|reply
Film really is a beautiful medium. Digital cameras have only just, (nearly?) caught up to the quality
[+] focom|4 years ago|reply
Beside cell phone and some western clothing, it still is the same vibe more than 100 year after.
[+] garfieldnate|4 years ago|reply
Does anyone know the name of that wind instrument is?