(no title)
heyrhett | 4 years ago
So funny watching bitter losers at hackernews get everything about blockchain wrong and stay poor over the past 10 years.
- Throw in some buzzwords you don't really understand like "lightning" (does not apply to helium as it is a protocol based on bitcoin script)
- use the word "scam" because you don't own any and you didn't invest a few months ago when it was pennies.
- sprinkle in some unfounded FUD about decentralization and Sybil attacks because you're bitter you still don't own any
Helium is the fastest growing wireless network on the planet.
There are currently 190,000 hotspots over the globe, up from 20,000 6-months ago. https://explorer.helium.com/
...but but but against your better judgement you read some of the technical stuff... wooooowwwww
Call me when the Helium node count drops below 100,000 again and I'll congratulate you and thank you for warning everyone about this "scam" before it was too late.
lozaning|4 years ago
In order to join the network and start mining, you've got to buy $80 worth of gear from some company marked up to $600. That company then has to pay $40 to the Helium company in order for them to generate private keys that let your miner join the network and start making money.
Helium is just https://network.fon.com/ on a different frequency + a bunch of unneeded crypto bullshit that hides the grift.
Call me when I can stand up my helium miner based on open source hardware and software and make money using that.
delabay|4 years ago
Helium will go down as one of quote unquote "actual uses for blockchain".
The proof is here. Lorawan coverage is now a solved problem.
NotSammyHagar|4 years ago
delabay|4 years ago
There are already thousands of societal beneficial uses of lorawan.
wyager|4 years ago
They clearly have some sort of central issuance because they have an airdrop. Their “proof” mechanism is either centralized or Sybil vulnerable - haven’t bothered checking which.
> So funny watching bitter losers at hackernews get everything about blockchain wrong and stay poor over the past 10 years.
This is a hilariously off-the-mark shot. I have nothing against blockchain when used where it’s actually useful (I.e. for solving double-spend or zooko). This, however, seems like a silly misapplication.
> Throw in some buzzwords you don't really understand like "lightning"
I think you did not understand what I said, which is that payment for network services should use normal payment mechanisms instead of special ones.
joewadcan|4 years ago
I think a deeper dive is warranted on what and how they are "paying" people. Helium tokens are used as an incentive to bootstrap a network, but in the future part of payment for network services like you mentioned. I think this is one of the purest uses of crypto... less as currency replacement but more sharing in a network's future.
heyrhett|4 years ago
> I have nothing against blockchain when used where it’s actually useful (I.e. for solving double-spend or zooko).
delabay|4 years ago
200k operators climbing their roof to deploy beneficial coverage beg to differ