The illicit participation in markets by the entire rodent kingdom probably deserves closer scrutiny. Not necessarily to curtail their efforts; but to identify which ones belong to what faction.
That’s what I thought this might be before reading the article. Off the top of my head maybe you could signal market movement with a certain stimulus (e.g. a green or red light for up or down market, varying intensity). Of course it wouldn’t work, but if it did the results would be gruesome. Imagine a network of thousands of hamsters plugged into a trading interface to exploit their collective pattern-recognition: the strong traders allowed to feed and reproduce, the weak ones obviously culled. The price of hamster bedding increases 10,000%. Just awful.
I'd be curious in seeing like 30 hamsters doing this, and comparing the statistics on their portfolios, and comparing to a uniformly-weighted (according to same probabilities) fixed (not actively traded) portfolios of the coins. With just one hamster it can just be random fluke. And also pick a few different start and stop times (cause looking at the graph, sometimes bitcoin came out ahead).
My gut says that random trades have the same expected value as the underlying asset, but increased variance. I'm not a finperson, so learning why this could be wrong would be a learning opportunity.
And if the story was written in July last year the opposite would be true. This article is dumb and is no different than the "monkey throwing darts at stocks"
> A hamster in Germany is redefining "A Random Walk Down Wall Street" author Burton Malkiel's belief that a blindfolded monkey throwing darts at a stock ticker list in the newspaper could do just as good as a human investment professional.
I know it's against the rules to question whether you read the article, but...
[+] [-] h2odragon|4 years ago|reply
The illicit participation in markets by the entire rodent kingdom probably deserves closer scrutiny. Not necessarily to curtail their efforts; but to identify which ones belong to what faction.
[+] [-] MPSimmons|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dqpb|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mbil|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] em3rgent0rdr|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tomjuggler|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] strange_things|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] billconan|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] arcticbull|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] StephenAmar|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] a9h74j|4 years ago|reply
Embellishment: Food withheld for poor performance == proof of stake
[+] [-] rkagerer|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rastafang|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aaron-santos|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] johnthescott|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bob229|4 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] mbesto|4 years ago|reply
And if the story was written in July last year the opposite would be true. This article is dumb and is no different than the "monkey throwing darts at stocks"
[+] [-] seoaeu|4 years ago|reply
> A hamster in Germany is redefining "A Random Walk Down Wall Street" author Burton Malkiel's belief that a blindfolded monkey throwing darts at a stock ticker list in the newspaper could do just as good as a human investment professional.
I know it's against the rules to question whether you read the article, but...
[+] [-] bdcravens|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MPSimmons|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mannykannot|4 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ausbah|4 years ago|reply