[cujo]

I think you can dial it back a notch. The comment they highlighted...

> She thinks they’re taking it down because they don’t want people to know the truth.

Isn't indicative of someone wanting to see long term data. That's someone who thinks the powers that be are hiding some smoking gun.

I'm sure there are folks with qualms about long term safety, but you're absolutely ignoring all the false information being pushed by a lot of the "hesitant". "Long term effects" is their strongest argument, but they rarely use it. Instead it's lots of stories being made up, statistics fabricated, and just flat out belligerence.

So yeah, I'm on board with the idea that "vaccine hesitant" is a term that should be used with discretion. Stand up for the truly hesitant. The rest are full of shit, and I have no problem with that label for them.