top | item 28724372 (no title) radisb | 4 years ago Oh, so if, hypothetically, someone did have to be fired to be replaced by a non-white-male, would you be against it? discuss order hn newest kenjackson|4 years ago If that was the literal rule (you had to fire a white male) then yes, I would be against it. The intent isn't to be spiteful against white males. It's to give space at the table for other groups that are intentionally excluded due to their race.
kenjackson|4 years ago If that was the literal rule (you had to fire a white male) then yes, I would be against it. The intent isn't to be spiteful against white males. It's to give space at the table for other groups that are intentionally excluded due to their race.
kenjackson|4 years ago