I'm not doubting major abuse occurred, and the church needs major reforms. But we should hold the numbers up to the same standard that we hold all other numbers to. There should be a detailed description of the sampling and data, a detailed description or the model used for the projection, and a detailed description and justification for any bias adjustments. Any results should have an error band. Otherwise, this is likely published with an agenda, not to find the truth.
rich_sasha|4 years ago
I used to think, well, someone accuses a priest, who knows maybe that's right or not, churches err on the side of innocence without proper evidence, and the rare monsters slip through the net. With more light being shed on this in Poland, I now believe this is not the case. There were now dozens of cases where each individual one ought to bring prosecutions on the ground of organised criminal organisation exploiting children (or at least organised cover-up), with the CC's top hierarchs held responsible. Each individual one, never mind the dozens that made it to the news.
So whether it's really 216,000 children abused, or even just 1% of that, I think this is catastrophic. Unless these numbers are inflated by a factor of 100,000, I'll stick to my opinion.
cowanon22|4 years ago
jliptzin|4 years ago
cowanon22|4 years ago
TheOtherHobbes|4 years ago
The record is clear and damning. A decimal point or two on the percentages doesn't change the facts.
Even one story like this is one story too many. And the number of stories like these is much greater than one.
https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/school-of-s...
cowanon22|4 years ago
We must have a zero tolerance policy for abuse, but bad reporting and bad extrapolation serve no one.