top | item 28887275 In Defense of Randomness 24 points| segalord | 4 years ago |naths.in 3 comments order hn newest skybrian|4 years ago It sounds like the explore / exploit trade off as seen in a multi-armed bandit problem.Also, a known source of randomness (that you add yourself or already occurring) is pretty important for determining causality. rob_c|4 years ago And to poke fun, my random post about hobbits and unicorns is clearly preordained by the boundary conditions of the big bang.It's not my fault I ate all the cheetos, it's science :p jimmySixDOF|4 years ago TFA author could use a good drunken walk through the garden of forking paths /s a1369209993|4 years ago [deleted]
skybrian|4 years ago It sounds like the explore / exploit trade off as seen in a multi-armed bandit problem.Also, a known source of randomness (that you add yourself or already occurring) is pretty important for determining causality.
rob_c|4 years ago And to poke fun, my random post about hobbits and unicorns is clearly preordained by the boundary conditions of the big bang.It's not my fault I ate all the cheetos, it's science :p
jimmySixDOF|4 years ago TFA author could use a good drunken walk through the garden of forking paths /s
skybrian|4 years ago
Also, a known source of randomness (that you add yourself or already occurring) is pretty important for determining causality.
rob_c|4 years ago
It's not my fault I ate all the cheetos, it's science :p
jimmySixDOF|4 years ago
a1369209993|4 years ago
[deleted]