[chofpsychiatry]

This is fantastic news.

We don't know much about Sarah, but we do know this:

She may not have given consent for this treatment; it may have been given by someone else on her behalf.[1]

Her current disease has no objective tests.[2]

Now if she wants to pursue the defence of her legal interests then oopsie! Looks like she's got a little remote-controlled electroshock device in the brainsie!

We would like to thank the NY Times for publishing this article and the commenters on Hacker News for allowing the psychiatrists to continue pursuing these activities.

Remember, it's not rape if you penetrate and deeply stimulate someone's brain directly!

[1] https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...

[2] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305338320_Seeking_a...