top | item 28914253 DNS – The First Distributed Database 3 points| aptxkid | 4 years ago |blog.the-pans.com | reply 1 comment order hn newest [+] [-] okdjnfweonfe|4 years ago|reply But what advantages does this have? the replication is arbitrary and unreliable, if a TLD server messes up for a minute? ok no problem, if more?https://old.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/q38p8x/entire_clu...I wouldn't call several layers of caching "distributed", there is still ever only X owning servers for each record, and usually all X are owned by the same group
[+] [-] okdjnfweonfe|4 years ago|reply But what advantages does this have? the replication is arbitrary and unreliable, if a TLD server messes up for a minute? ok no problem, if more?https://old.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/q38p8x/entire_clu...I wouldn't call several layers of caching "distributed", there is still ever only X owning servers for each record, and usually all X are owned by the same group
[+] [-] okdjnfweonfe|4 years ago|reply
https://old.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/q38p8x/entire_clu...
I wouldn't call several layers of caching "distributed", there is still ever only X owning servers for each record, and usually all X are owned by the same group