top | item 28921776 (no title) ugwigr | 4 years ago does not mean it is right discuss order hn newest kjaftaedi|4 years ago It doesn't mean it's right, but on this site it is.Allowing people to editorialize headlines and pick biased sources skews the discussion.Since we want to limit multiple similar discussion threads but allow everyone to continue talking, this is a good compromise.Giving too much credit to a biased source or blogspam post goes too far in the direction of skewing the discussion IMHO.Also the link or headline might change multiple times. Best to just keep it simple. tptacek|4 years ago You're right, it doesn't mean that. But independently of that point, what HN does here is right. jacquesm|4 years ago And more than any other online forum would do, it's in fact an exercise in transparency, and super labor intensive to boot. load replies (1) ugwigr|4 years ago in your opinion it is right, in my opinion it is wrong.
kjaftaedi|4 years ago It doesn't mean it's right, but on this site it is.Allowing people to editorialize headlines and pick biased sources skews the discussion.Since we want to limit multiple similar discussion threads but allow everyone to continue talking, this is a good compromise.Giving too much credit to a biased source or blogspam post goes too far in the direction of skewing the discussion IMHO.Also the link or headline might change multiple times. Best to just keep it simple.
tptacek|4 years ago You're right, it doesn't mean that. But independently of that point, what HN does here is right. jacquesm|4 years ago And more than any other online forum would do, it's in fact an exercise in transparency, and super labor intensive to boot. load replies (1) ugwigr|4 years ago in your opinion it is right, in my opinion it is wrong.
jacquesm|4 years ago And more than any other online forum would do, it's in fact an exercise in transparency, and super labor intensive to boot. load replies (1)
kjaftaedi|4 years ago
Allowing people to editorialize headlines and pick biased sources skews the discussion.
Since we want to limit multiple similar discussion threads but allow everyone to continue talking, this is a good compromise.
Giving too much credit to a biased source or blogspam post goes too far in the direction of skewing the discussion IMHO.
Also the link or headline might change multiple times. Best to just keep it simple.
tptacek|4 years ago
jacquesm|4 years ago
ugwigr|4 years ago