top | item 28936114

(no title)

fighterpilot | 4 years ago

You're arguing that tests for intellectual ability aren't perfect, and they're therefore useless. This is a bad argument.

discuss

order

politician|4 years ago

It's the same argument as for eliminating TAG programs: that no one should be accelerated because not everyone is accelerated.

This seems like a distressingly common construction. Is it a logical fallacy? Does it have a name?

cutemonster|4 years ago

> Does it have a name?

The word "jealousy" comes to my mind

Maybe sometimes feelings, not logic underlies the arguments? And any logics was made up afterwards