(no title)
sunny--tech | 4 years ago
"They said we were experimenting on the backs of children," Danner said.
"But when SpaceX launched their first five rockets and they blew up, was that OK?" he continued. "We're in a more high-stakes world of human development. Still, you can't say that you don't like the way things are but don't want people to try new things."
This is one of the problems of mixing VCs in the education space. “Move fast and break things” doesn’t work when the “things” are humans, not code and technology.
Also, last time I checked, SpaceX wasn’t promising 80% of its rockets would work back in its early days.
Good ol’ fashion false equivalency.
lostinquebec|4 years ago
Is your criticism that these places are making false promises, or:
> “Move fast and break things” doesn’t work when the “things” are humans, not code and technology.
RCTs and placebos work exactly this way. People literally die to help us learn what does and does not work. We lost 8-9 months of COVID-19 deaths because of a system that needs to go slow, and yet had experimentation regimes that still put participants at risk.
I don't know of any verification method that doesn't require some degree of risk for the participants, but I'd love to hear one.
lozenge|4 years ago
sunny--tech|4 years ago
I’m criticizing both the false claims and the VC model of hyper scaling and hyper growth being applied to education.
"Move fast and break things" isn't the motto of the medical industry, but it is for tech. So how is this even related?
If you want to talk about medicine, that’s a completely different discussion.