(no title)
arcatek | 4 years ago
There's no telling whether it'd be the "hijacked" branch or the original one - assuming they control 50%+ of the mining power, there's a decent argument that the remaining miners would follow their lead if only to stay on the largest branch.
dannyw|4 years ago
danbruc|4 years ago
There is a protocol and system specification. There are implementations of that specifications. There is a distributed system running those implementations. And the distributed system has a state. Each of those can change and each of those or a combination of them could arguably be called Bitcoin.
If everyone would run new implementations with a different coin cap, you can argue that it is no longer Bitcoin because Bitcoin is a very specific specification with a 21M coin cap, but this would have little bearing on the actual situation.
UncleMeat|4 years ago
capableweb|4 years ago
Usually forks have checkpoints as well so things can't change willy-nilly.
jstanley|4 years ago