top | item 29094029 (no title) throwawayswede | 4 years ago So should be quoting HN rules without explaining exactly and very specifically how and what you're referencing applies. discuss order hn newest junon|4 years ago "Bad faith" is pretty self-explanatory, is it not? Of course it was sarcasm, the point being made is a bad faith assumption of the GP's point. throwawayswede|4 years ago The point is not in explaining "bad faith", but in explaining how and why the comment you're replying to is "bad faith". Was not clear to me at all that you were being sarcastic. load replies (1)
junon|4 years ago "Bad faith" is pretty self-explanatory, is it not? Of course it was sarcasm, the point being made is a bad faith assumption of the GP's point. throwawayswede|4 years ago The point is not in explaining "bad faith", but in explaining how and why the comment you're replying to is "bad faith". Was not clear to me at all that you were being sarcastic. load replies (1)
throwawayswede|4 years ago The point is not in explaining "bad faith", but in explaining how and why the comment you're replying to is "bad faith". Was not clear to me at all that you were being sarcastic. load replies (1)
junon|4 years ago
throwawayswede|4 years ago