top | item 29126077

(no title)

mikeklaas | 4 years ago

whoa, do you have a link?

discuss

order

Waterluvian|4 years ago

https://imgur.com/dCxh2Dd (sorry. Looks terrible on phones)

https://forums.aws.amazon.com/ann.jspa?annID=8499

So obviously I was embellishing the language, but the sentiment remains the same. I found this because I checked the RDS admin panel, which I rarely do. I didn't get an email. It was very alarming to discover and makes me anxious about what other forced upgrades I'll miss.

I appreciate the point of this, but I think forcing upgrades is absolutely the wrong way to do it. Scream at me all you want, but don't force my stack to mutate and potentially break services.

scoopertrooper|4 years ago

Easy to blame AWS, but as the post you linked said, Postgres 9.6 is no longer going to be receiving updates from 11 November.

What do you want AWS to do here? Keep running software that won't get security updates? That seems a bit wild to me.

Communication could have been better, but there is no universe in which a managed database provider should be expected to continue to maintain instances with discontinued versions of software.

Why were you still running 9.6 anyway?

https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/

merrywhether|4 years ago

At some point the alternatives are force-updating your DB or shutting it down. One of those at least has a chance of keeping your service online. I agree the lack of communication is pretty bad though.

bserge|4 years ago

The lesson here is to use proper hosting instead of AWS or some other fart cloud.